In the context of international relations, nonalignment is when a nation decides not to associate with any established power blocs. The nonalignment movement was first introduced during the cold war. The goal behind it was to allow newly independent nations to separate themselves from the two global superpowers: the United States and Soviet Union.

Currently, nonalignment is a political strategy, allowing countries to freely trade and attract investment around the globe. As tariffs and tensions rise between the United States and China, many nations are choosing to revisit this strategy. In Asia, India and Indonesia are examples of nations that have chosen not to align with any particular side. Countries adopting this strategy are able to maintain global relations without actually committing to a singular bloc.

However, it’s important to acknowledge that modern nonalignment does not translate to passive neutrality. While on the surface it may seem as a method of freedom, it also gives an opportunity for these countries to act as mediators. During global conflicts and negotiations these nations can act as a bridge, fostering peace and discussion.

The nonalignment is a reflection of pragmatism and awareness. States are beginning to realize that aligning with a superpower doesn’t guarantee either safety or influence. Thus, flexibility and freedom in a globalized world is more reliable compared to forming an alliance that is tenuous and unpredictable.

Neutrality has become a strategy, rather than a sign of weakness. Through nonalignment countries are able to expand influence through freedom rather than military strength and conflict. Autonomy is the end goal of many nations.